talent: be better than work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.64
, asset
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings star
Weight: 0.67
, creativity
Weight: 0.64
, athletics
Weight: 0.62
, programmer
Weight: 0.59
, entertainer
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than work 1.00
be better than hard work 0.95
work 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(talent, be better than work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(asset, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(talent, be better than work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(asset, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asset, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(creativity, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(talent, be better than work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(asset, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(talent, be better than work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(creativity, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(creativity, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(talent, be better than work)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talent, be better than hard work)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(talent, be better than hard work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(talent, be better than hard work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(talent, work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(talent, work)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talent, be better than work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(talent, be better than work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(asset, work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(creativity, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(asset, work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(talent, be better than work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)