tape dispenser: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.54
Siblings tape
Weight: 0.37
, duct tape
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.35
, tape measure
Weight: 0.35
, paper clip
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be at post office 0.90
be at office build 0.88
be at office supply store 0.82
be at desk 0.78
be at your desk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(object, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be at office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(object, be at desk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(object, be at desk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be at desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(paper clip, be at office supply store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(paper clip, be at your desk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(object, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(paper clip, be at office supply store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(paper clip, be at office supply store)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(scotch tape, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(scotch tape, be at desk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(paper clip, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(paper clip, be at your desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(tape dispenser, be at office)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(tape dispenser, be at post office)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at post office)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tape dispenser, be at post office)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office build)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tape dispenser, be at office build)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(object, be at desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(paper clip, be at office supply store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch tape, be at desk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(paper clip, be at your desk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(tape dispenser, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(object, be at desk)