taste: be different from taste of cold drink

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from taste of cold drink 1.00
be different from taste of hot cold drink 0.98
be different from taste of drink 0.97
be different from taste of hot drink 0.96
be different from taste 0.89
affect taste of food 0.84
be important for taste 0.84
be important to taste 0.84
be important than taste 0.84
affect taste 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important for taste)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(smell, affect taste of food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(texture, be important to taste)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important than taste)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(texture, affect taste)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(smell, affect taste)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(smell, affect taste)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(smell, affect taste)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(texture, affect taste)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(texture, affect taste)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(smell, be important than taste)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(smell, be important than taste)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(smell, affect taste of food)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(smell, affect taste of food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(texture, be important to taste)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(texture, be important to taste)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(smell, be important for taste)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(smell, be important for taste)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of hot cold drink)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(taste, be different from taste of hot cold drink)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of hot drink)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(taste, be different from taste of hot cold drink)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(taste, be different from taste of hot drink)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(taste, be different from taste of hot cold drink)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taste, be different from taste of hot drink)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(taste, be different from taste of hot drink)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(smell, affect taste)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(texture, affect taste)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(smell, be important than taste)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(smell, affect taste of food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(smell, be important for taste)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(texture, be important to taste)