tax: be in scandinavia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.63
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, cost
Weight: 0.59
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.75
, surcharge
Weight: 0.66
, income
Weight: 0.64
, rate
Weight: 0.62
, inheritance
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in scandinavia 1.00
be in place 0.78
were even made 0.76
be put in place 0.75
be important in work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(policy, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tax, be in scandinavia)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(policy, be in place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tax, be in scandinavia)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(policy, be put in place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tax, be in scandinavia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(policy, be in place)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(policy, be put in place)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(policy, be in place)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(policy, be put in place)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(policy, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tax, be in scandinavia)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(policy, be in place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tax, be in scandinavia)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(policy, be put in place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tax, be in scandinavia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tax, be in scandinavia)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(tax, were even made)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tax, were even made)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(tax, were even made)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tax, were even made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tax, be in scandinavia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tax, be in scandinavia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, be in place)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, be put in place)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(policy, be important in work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, be in place)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, be put in place)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(tax, be in scandinavia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(policy, be important in work)