tea: be best with water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.62
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.61
Siblings high tea
Weight: 0.59
, frappe
Weight: 0.39
, coffee
Weight: 0.35
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.34
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best with water 1.00
be best with hot water 0.93
need water 0.82
need hot water 0.81
be done quicker in hot water 0.79
be done quicker in water 0.77
dissolve faster in hot water 0.76
be good for cold 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(crop, need water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tea, be best with water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(crop, need water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(crop, need water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(crop, need water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tea, be best with water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tea, be best with water)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tea, be best with hot water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tea, be best with hot water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tea, be best with hot water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(tea, dissolve faster in hot water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(tea, dissolve faster in hot water)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tea, be best with water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tea, be best with water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(crop, need water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tea, be best with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(crop, need water)