telephone: be improved

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cellular telephone
Weight: 0.76
, telephone system
Weight: 0.66
, device
Weight: 0.61
, network
Weight: 0.61
, utility
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, pager
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be improved 1.00
improve quality for people 0.82
improve quality for people today 0.81
has quality better 0.78
improve communication 0.77
improve audio 0.77
improve communication for individual 0.76
improve school safety 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(telephone, be improved)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(network, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(telephone, be improved)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(network, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(device, improve audio)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(device, improve audio)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, improve quality for people today)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, improve quality for people)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, improve school safety)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(computer network, improve communication for individual)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(computer network, improve communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(network, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(telephone, be improved)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(telephone, be improved)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(computer network, improve communication)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(computer network, improve communication)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cellphone, improve quality for people today)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(cellphone, improve quality for people today)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(cellphone, improve quality for people)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cellphone, improve quality for people)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(computer network, improve communication for individual)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(computer network, improve communication for individual)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cellphone, improve school safety)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cellphone, improve school safety)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(telephone, be improved)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(telephone, be improved)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(network, has quality better)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(device, improve audio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(computer network, improve communication)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cellphone, improve quality for people today)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cellphone, improve quality for people)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cellphone, improve school safety)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer network, improve communication for individual)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(network, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(telephone, be improved)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(device, improve audio)