telescope: be more useful than optical telescopes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.69
, device
Weight: 0.62
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.57
Siblings radio telescope
Weight: 0.39
, comet
Weight: 0.35
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more useful than optical telescopes 1.00
be more useful than telescopes 0.95
be in space help astronomers 0.81
be useful in astronomy 0.81
be important to astronomers 0.81
be used in astronomy 0.79
be important in astronomy 0.78
use lasers 0.78
need two lenses 0.76
be sent on artificial satellites 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in astronomy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(telescope, be more useful than telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(telescope, be more useful than telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(telescope, be more useful than telescopes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than telescopes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(telescope, use lasers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(telescope, be used in astronomy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(telescope, be in space help astronomers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(telescope, use lasers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(telescope, need two lenses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(telescope, be sent on artificial satellites)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be important in astronomy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(telescope, be important to astronomers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(telescope, be important in astronomy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be used in astronomy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be in space help astronomers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(telescope, need two lenses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(telescope, be used in astronomy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be important to astronomers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(telescope, be in space help astronomers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(telescope, need two lenses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be sent on artificial satellites)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(telescope, be sent on artificial satellites)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(telescope, need two lenses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(telescope, use lasers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(telescope, be in space help astronomers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(telescope, be sent on artificial satellites)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(telescope, be important to astronomers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(telescope, use lasers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(telescope, be used in astronomy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(telescope, be important to astronomers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(telescope, be important in astronomy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(telescope, be important in astronomy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than optical telescopes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)