television: be better than radio

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cable
Weight: 0.71
, channel
Weight: 0.71
, television show
Weight: 0.69
, broadcast
Weight: 0.68
Siblings television program
Weight: 0.70
, television series
Weight: 0.69
, radio
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.65
, movie screen
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than radio 1.00
be more popular than radio 0.94
be more useful than radio 0.93
be called radio 0.89
be better than television 0.89
am is less popular than fm radio 0.84
be better than tv 0.84
am is fuzzier than fm radio 0.83
am sound like radio 0.82
use radio waves 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(radio, be called radio)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than tv)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(radio, be called radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(radio, be called radio)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(radio, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(radio, be better than television)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(radio, be better than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(radio, be better than tv)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(television, be better than radio)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(television, be more useful than radio)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(television, be more useful than radio)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(television, be more popular than radio)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(television, be more popular than radio)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(television, be more popular than radio)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(television, use radio waves)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(television, use radio waves)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(television, use radio waves)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(television, be more useful than radio)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(television, be more useful than radio)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(television, use radio waves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(television, be more popular than radio)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(television, be better than radio)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(television, be better than radio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(radio, be called radio)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radio, be better than television)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(television, be better than radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(radio, be better than tv)