tennis ball: have fuz

Related concepts

Parents	golf ball Weight: 0.80 , tennis racket Weight: 0.78 , soccer ball Weight: 0.77 , ball Weight: 0.60
Siblings	cue ball Weight: 0.41 , bowling ball Weight: 0.40 , ball bearing Weight: 0.40 , tennis Weight: 0.39 , cotton ball Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have dimpels	1.00
have fuz	1.00
have 15 30 40	1.00
be in lithuania	0.77
were introtuced in 1986	0.76
be jugded	0.76
have numbers on them	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(golf ball, have dimpels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(tennis ball, have fuz)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(golf ball, have numbers on them) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(tennis ball, have fuz)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(ball, be in lithuania) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(tennis ball, have fuz)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(golf ball, have dimpels)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(ball, be in lithuania)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(golf ball, have numbers on them)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(ball, be in lithuania)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(golf ball, have dimpels)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(golf ball, have numbers on them)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(tennis, have 15 30 40)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(tennis, be jugded)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(golf ball, have dimpels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(golf ball, have numbers on them) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(ball, be in lithuania) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(tennis, have 15 30 40) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(tennis, have 15 30 40)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(tennis, be jugded) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(tennis, be jugded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(tennis ball, have fuz)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have numbers on them)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(tennis ball, have numbers on them)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(tennis ball, have numbers on them)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(tennis ball, have numbers on them)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(tennis ball, have fuz)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(golf ball, have dimpels)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(ball, be in lithuania)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(golf ball, have numbers on them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(tennis, be jugded)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(tennis, have 15 30 40)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(golf ball, have dimpels)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(ball, be in lithuania)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(tennis ball, have fuz) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(golf ball, have numbers on them)