tennis ball: were introtuced in 1986

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents golf ball
Weight: 0.80
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.78
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.77
, ball
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cue ball
Weight: 0.41
, bowling ball
Weight: 0.40
, ball bearing
Weight: 0.40
, tennis
Weight: 0.39
, cotton ball
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
were introtuced in 1986 1.00
were devolped 0.99
was in 1500s 0.84
be in lithuania 0.82
have dimpels 0.76
have fuz 0.76
have 15 30 40 0.76
was made 0.76
was dropped after 1924 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(golf ball, were devolped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(golf ball, have dimpels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ball, be in lithuania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(golf ball, were devolped)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ball, be in lithuania)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(golf ball, have dimpels)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ball, be in lithuania)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, were devolped)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, have dimpels)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was in 1500s)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(tennis, have 15 30 40)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(golf ball, were devolped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(golf ball, have dimpels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ball, be in lithuania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tennis, was in 1500s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tennis, was in 1500s)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tennis, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tennis, was made)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(tennis, have 15 30 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tennis, have 15 30 40)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tennis ball, have fuz)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, have fuz)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(tennis ball, have fuz)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, have fuz)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(golf ball, were devolped)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ball, be in lithuania)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(golf ball, have dimpels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tennis, was in 1500s)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tennis, was made)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tennis, have 15 30 40)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(golf ball, were devolped)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ball, be in lithuania)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(tennis ball, were introtuced in 1986) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(golf ball, have dimpels)