tennis: was in 1500s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, hobby
Weight: 0.62
, swimming pool
Weight: 0.62
, ball
Weight: 0.60
Siblings table tennis
Weight: 0.75
, tennis ball
Weight: 0.39
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.38
, tennis court
Weight: 0.37
, tennis player
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in 1500s 1.00
was made 0.86
was played long ago 0.80
was played 0.79
was dicovered 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(tennis, was in 1500s)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tennis, was made)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tennis, was played)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played long ago)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(tennis, was dicovered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was dicovered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tennis, was dicovered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(tennis, was played long ago)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tennis, was played long ago)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tennis, was dicovered)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tennis, was played long ago)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tennis, was played)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tennis, was made)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(tennis, was made)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tennis, was played)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was made)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was in 1500s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tennis, was in 1500s)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tennis, was in 1500s)