tennis court: has net

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court
Weight: 0.68
, playground
Weight: 0.65
, golf course
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.64
Siblings basketball court
Weight: 0.82
, volleyball
Weight: 0.65
, supreme court
Weight: 0.39
, tennis
Weight: 0.37
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has net 1.00
has net across middle 0.87
has net divide it in half 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(basketball court, has net)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(basketball court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(basketball court, has net)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tennis court, has net)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tennis court, has net across middle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(tennis court, has net across middle)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has net across middle)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tennis court, has net across middle)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tennis court, has net divide it in half)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has net)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tennis court, has net)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has net) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(basketball court, has net)