tennis court: has net divide it in half

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court
Weight: 0.68
, playground
Weight: 0.65
, golf course
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.64
Siblings basketball court
Weight: 0.82
, volleyball
Weight: 0.65
, supreme court
Weight: 0.39
, tennis
Weight: 0.37
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has net divide it in half 1.00
has net 0.86
has net across middle 0.85
be divide into game 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sport, be divide into game)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tennis court, has net divide it in half)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sport, be divide into game)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sport, be divide into game)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(basketball court, has net)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sport, be divide into game)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tennis court, has net divide it in half)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(basketball court, has net)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(basketball court, has net)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(tennis court, has net divide it in half)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tennis court, has net)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tennis court, has net across middle)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tennis court, has net)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tennis court, has net across middle)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has net)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has net across middle)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(tennis court, has net across middle)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tennis court, has net)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has net divide it in half)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tennis court, has net divide it in half)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sport, be divide into game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(basketball court, has net)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tennis court, has net divide it in half)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sport, be divide into game)