tennis game: has two player

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.73
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, football game
Weight: 0.41
, baseball game
Weight: 0.41
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.39
, table tennis
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has two player 1.00
use piece to represent player 0.80
be play by individual or team 0.76
has one winner 0.75
be for play 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(game, use piece to represent player)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(tennis game, has two player)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(game, be for play)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(tennis game, has two player)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(game, be play by individual or team)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(tennis game, has two player)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(game, has one winner)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(tennis game, has two player)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(game, has one winner)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(game, be play by individual or team)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(game, use piece to represent player)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(game, be for play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(game, has one winner)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(game, use piece to represent player)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(game, be play by individual or team)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(game, be for play)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(game, use piece to represent player)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(tennis game, has two player)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(game, be for play)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(tennis game, has two player)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(game, be play by individual or team)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(tennis game, has two player)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(game, has one winner)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(tennis game, has two player)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tennis game, has two player)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(tennis game, has two player)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(game, be for play)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(game, use piece to represent player)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(game, be play by individual or team)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(game, has one winner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(game, be for play)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(game, use piece to represent player)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(game, be play by individual or team)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(tennis game, has two player)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(game, has one winner)