tensile strength: be important in engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strength
Weight: 0.71
, characteristic
Weight: 0.68
, factor
Weight: 0.65
, material
Weight: 0.62
, quality
Weight: 0.61
Siblings hardness
Weight: 0.36
, elasticity
Weight: 0.35
, toughness
Weight: 0.34
, shear
Weight: 0.34
, raw material
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in engineering 1.00
be important engineering 1.00
be engineering 0.97
be important to engineer 0.85
be important in field of science 0.77
be important in architecture 0.77
be important in economics 0.76
be important in manufacturing 0.76
be important to study of economics 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(material, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(material, be important engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(strength, be important to engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(material, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(characteristic, be important in field of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(quality, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(strength, be important in engineering)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(material, be important in engineering)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(material, be important engineering)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(strength, be important to engineer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(quality, be important in manufacturing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(characteristic, be important in field of science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(material, be important in architecture)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(strength, be important in engineering)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in manufacturing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be important in field of science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(material, be important in engineering)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(material, be important engineering)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(strength, be important to engineer)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(material, be important in architecture)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be important in engineering)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be important to study of economics)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be important in economics)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(toughness, be important in engineering)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(material, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(material, be important engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(strength, be important to engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(material, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(characteristic, be important in field of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(quality, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(toughness, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(toughness, be important in engineering)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(elasticity, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(elasticity, be important in engineering)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(elasticity, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(elasticity, be important in economics)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(elasticity, be important to study of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(elasticity, be important to study of economics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tensile strength, be important in engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(strength, be important in engineering)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(quality, be important in manufacturing)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(material, be important engineering)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(material, be important in engineering)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(strength, be important to engineer)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(characteristic, be important in field of science)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(material, be important in architecture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(toughness, be important in engineering)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hardness, be important in engineering)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(elasticity, be important in engineering)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(elasticity, be important in economics)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(elasticity, be important to study of economics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(strength, be important in engineering)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(material, be important in engineering)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(material, be important engineering)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(strength, be important to engineer)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(characteristic, be important in field of science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(material, be important in architecture)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(quality, be important in manufacturing)