territory: affect distribution of animal species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.65
, field
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings palestine
Weight: 0.61
, guyana
Weight: 0.50
, vanuatu
Weight: 0.37
, tuvalu
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect distribution of animal species 1.00
affect distribution 0.83
be important to animals 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(field, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(territory, affect distribution of animal species)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(field, be important to animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(field, be important to animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(field, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(territory, affect distribution of animal species)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(territory, affect distribution of animal species)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(territory, affect distribution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(territory, affect distribution)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(territory, affect distribution)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(territory, be important to animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(territory, be important to animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(territory, be important to animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(territory, be important to animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(territory, affect distribution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(territory, affect distribution of animal species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(territory, affect distribution of animal species)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(field, be important to animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(territory, affect distribution of animal species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(field, be important to animals)