territory: be considered as element of state

Property	Similarity
be considered as element of state	1.00
be considered as element	0.97
be considered as major element of state	0.96
be considered as major element	0.93
be essential element of state	0.90
be important in state	0.79
become state	0.77

0.82

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(territory, be considered as element)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(territory, be considered as element)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(territory, be considered as major element of state)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(territory, be essential element of state)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(territory, be essential element of state)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(territory, be considered as major element of state)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(territory, be important in state)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(territory, be important in state)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(territory, be important in state)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(territory, be essential element of state)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(territory, be considered as major element of state)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(territory, be considered as element)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(territory, become state)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(territory, be considered as major element)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(territory, become state)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(territory, become state)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(territory, be essential element of state)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(territory, become state)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(territory, be important in state)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(territory, be considered as major element of state)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(territory, be considered as major element)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(territory, be considered as major element)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(territory, be considered as major element)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(territory, be considered as element of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(territory, be considered as element)

Parents	land Weight: 0.65 , field Weight: 0.61 , nation Weight: 0.58 , element Weight: 0.57 , factor Weight: 0.56
Siblings	palestine Weight: 0.61 , guyana Weight: 0.50 , vanuatu Weight: 0.37 , tuvalu Weight: 0.36

territory: be considered as element of state

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings