territory: become state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.65
, field
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings palestine
Weight: 0.61
, guyana
Weight: 0.50
, vanuatu
Weight: 0.37
, tuvalu
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
become state 1.00
has state state 0.83
become american state 0.82
be important in state 0.80
be considered as element of state 0.77
be considered as major element of state 0.77
has state states 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(palestine, become state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(palestine, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(palestine, become state)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(palestine, become state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(palestine, has state state)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(palestine, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(territory, become state)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(territory, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(territory, be considered as element of state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(territory, has state state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(territory, be important in state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(territory, has state state)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(territory, become state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(territory, become state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(palestine, become state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(territory, become state)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(palestine, has state state)