territory: has state states

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.65
, field
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings palestine
Weight: 0.61
, guyana
Weight: 0.50
, vanuatu
Weight: 0.37
, tuvalu
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state states 1.00
has state state 0.89
has state provinces 0.81
be important in state 0.81
become state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(palestine, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(palestine, become state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(palestine, has state state)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(palestine, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(palestine, become state)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(palestine, become state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(territory, has state states)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(territory, has state state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(territory, has state provinces)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(territory, has state provinces)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(territory, has state provinces)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(territory, has state state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(territory, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(territory, be important in state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(territory, be important in state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(territory, be important in state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(territory, has state provinces)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(territory, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(territory, become state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(territory, become state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(territory, be important in state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(territory, become state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(territory, become state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(territory, has state states)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(territory, has state states)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(palestine, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(territory, has state states)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(palestine, become state)