tester: has state election

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.56
, role
Weight: 0.54
, problem
Weight: 0.51
, instrument
Weight: 0.49
, user
Weight: 0.49
Siblings smoke detector
Weight: 0.32
, thermistor
Weight: 0.32
, colorimeter
Weight: 0.32
, prototype
Weight: 0.32
, electronic device
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state election 1.00
is election results 0.87
run for reelection 0.83
be up up reelection 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tester, has state election)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tester, is election results)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tester, is election results)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tester, run for reelection)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(tester, is election results)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tester, be up up reelection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(tester, run for reelection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tester, be up up reelection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(tester, be up up reelection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tester, run for reelection)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tester, is election results)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tester, run for reelection)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tester, be up up reelection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tester, has state election)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tester, has state election)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tester, has state election)