tetanus: be considered non communicable disease

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.66
, illness
Weight: 0.63
, disease
Weight: 0.61
, bacillus
Weight: 0.56
, vaccine
Weight: 0.55
Siblings diarrhea
Weight: 0.36
, measles
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.36
, typhoid fever
Weight: 0.36
, chickenpox
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered non communicable disease 1.00
be considered communicable disease 0.98
be considered non disease 0.92
be considered disease 0.89
is infectious disease 0.85
has state disease 0.84
is serious illness 0.78
be more prevalent disease than than australia 0.77
be to diseases useful usa 0.77
is zoonotic 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(illness, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(illness, has state disease)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(illness, has state disease)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(measles, be more prevalent disease than than australia)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, is serious illness)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chickenpox, is infectious disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(measles, is infectious disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(measles, has state disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(measles, is zoonotic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(illness, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(measles, is infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(measles, is infectious disease)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chickenpox, is infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chickenpox, is infectious disease)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(measles, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(measles, has state disease)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(measles, is zoonotic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(measles, is zoonotic)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chickenpox, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lyme disease, is serious illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, is serious illness)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(measles, be more prevalent disease than than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(measles, be more prevalent disease than than australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered non disease)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(tetanus, is infectious disease)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered disease)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered communicable disease)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(tetanus, be considered non disease)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(tetanus, is zoonotic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tetanus, is infectious disease)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tetanus, be considered disease)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(tetanus, be considered communicable disease)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tetanus, has state disease)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tetanus, is zoonotic)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tetanus, has state disease)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(tetanus, be considered disease)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tetanus, be considered communicable disease)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered communicable disease)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(tetanus, is infectious disease)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(tetanus, is zoonotic)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, has state disease)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tetanus, has state disease)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered disease)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, is infectious disease)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, is zoonotic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illness, has state disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(chickenpox, is infectious disease)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(measles, is infectious disease)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(measles, has state disease)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(measles, is zoonotic)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, is serious illness)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(measles, be more prevalent disease than than australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illness, has state disease)