tetanus: be considered non disease

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.66
, illness
Weight: 0.63
, disease
Weight: 0.61
, bacillus
Weight: 0.56
, vaccine
Weight: 0.55
Siblings diarrhea
Weight: 0.36
, measles
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.36
, typhoid fever
Weight: 0.36
, chickenpox
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered non disease 1.00
be considered disease 0.94
be considered non communicable disease 0.92
be considered communicable disease 0.87
has state disease 0.85
is infectious disease 0.80
be considered health issue 0.77
be more prevalent disease than than australia 0.77
be to diseases useful usa 0.76
prevent illness 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(illness, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered non disease)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(vaccine, prevent illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered non disease)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vaccine, prevent illness)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(illness, has state disease)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(illness, has state disease)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(vaccine, prevent illness)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(measles, be considered health issue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(measles, be more prevalent disease than than australia)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(measles, has state disease)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chickenpox, is infectious disease)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(measles, is infectious disease)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(illness, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(vaccine, prevent illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(measles, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(measles, has state disease)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(measles, is infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(measles, is infectious disease)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chickenpox, is infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chickenpox, is infectious disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chickenpox, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(measles, be considered health issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(measles, be considered health issue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(measles, be more prevalent disease than than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(measles, be more prevalent disease than than australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(tetanus, be considered non disease)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered disease)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(tetanus, is infectious disease)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered disease)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered communicable disease)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, has state disease)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tetanus, be considered disease)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tetanus, is infectious disease)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, is infectious disease)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(tetanus, be considered disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered non communicable disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered communicable disease)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(tetanus, be considered communicable disease)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(tetanus, is infectious disease)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tetanus, has state disease)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tetanus, has state disease)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tetanus, be considered communicable disease)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tetanus, has state disease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tetanus, be considered non disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(vaccine, prevent illness)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illness, has state disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(measles, has state disease)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(chickenpox, is infectious disease)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(measles, is infectious disease)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(measles, be considered health issue)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(measles, be more prevalent disease than than australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(vaccine, prevent illness)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(tetanus, be considered non disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illness, has state disease)