theory: be important in relations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explanation
Weight: 0.71
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, model
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings string theory
Weight: 0.75
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.75
, relativity
Weight: 0.72
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, constructivism
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in relations 1.00
be important in international relations 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be important in international relations)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be important in relations)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(constructivism, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(constructivism, be important in relations)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(constructivism, be important in international relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(constructivism, be important in international relations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(theory, be important in relations)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theory, be important in international relations)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in international relations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in international relations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theory, be important in international relations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in relations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(theory, be important in relations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(constructivism, be important in relations)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(constructivism, be important in international relations)