:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(thing, grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(thing, grow)
Similarity expansion
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(thing, grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(thing, need grow)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(thing, grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(thing, need grow)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(thing, grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(thing, need grow)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(thing, grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(thing, need grow)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(thing, grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(thing, grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, grow)
Typical implies Plausible
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(thing, grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(thing, grow)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings