:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(thing, need grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(thing, need grow)
Similarity expansion
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(thing, need grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(thing, grow)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(thing, need grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, grow)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(thing, need grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(thing, grow)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(thing, need grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(thing, grow)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(thing, need grow)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(thing, need grow)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings