think: causes have idea

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.77
, work
Weight: 0.65
, people
Weight: 0.65
, word
Weight: 0.58
, song
Weight: 0.56
Siblings thought
Weight: 0.38
, remember
Weight: 0.38
, know
Weight: 0.37
, what
Weight: 0.37
, anybody
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes have idea 1.00
be used to get idea 0.92
causes you create idea 0.90
causes come up with idea 0.89
be used to form new idea 0.85
be motivated by come up with idea 0.85
be used to develop idea 0.84
be used to come up with new idea 0.84
causes new idea occur 0.83
requires write down idea 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(remember, requires write down idea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(remember, requires write down idea)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(remember, requires write down idea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(think, causes have idea)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(think, be used to get idea)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(think, be used to get idea)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(think, be used to form new idea)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(think, be used to get idea)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to get idea)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(think, causes have idea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(think, causes have idea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(remember, requires write down idea)