think: be used to develop idea

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.77
, work
Weight: 0.65
, people
Weight: 0.65
, word
Weight: 0.58
, song
Weight: 0.56
Siblings thought
Weight: 0.38
, remember
Weight: 0.38
, know
Weight: 0.37
, what
Weight: 0.37
, anybody
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to develop idea 1.00
causes you create idea 0.88
be used to get idea 0.88
be used to form new idea 0.86
causes have idea 0.84
be use together to communicate complex idea 0.84
be used to come up with new idea 0.83
be used to create something 0.83
causes come up with idea 0.81
be motivated by come up with idea 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(work, be used to create something)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(think, be used to develop idea)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(think, be used to develop idea)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(work, be used to create something)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(work, be used to create something)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(think, be used to develop idea)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(work, be used to create something)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(think, be used to develop idea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(think, be used to develop idea)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(think, be used to get idea)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(think, causes have idea)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to form new idea)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(think, be used to form new idea)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to get idea)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(think, be used to come up with new idea)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(think, causes have idea)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to come up with new idea)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(think, be used to form new idea)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(think, be used to get idea)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(think, be used to come up with new idea)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(think, causes have idea)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(think, be used to form new idea)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(think, be used to come up with new idea)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(think, be used to get idea)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(think, causes have idea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(think, be used to develop idea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(work, be used to create something)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(work, be used to create something)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)