third person: be better than first

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.67
, force
Weight: 0.61
, time
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arbitrator
Weight: 0.51
, one person
Weight: 0.40
, elderly person
Weight: 0.38
, homeless person
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than first 1.00
be better second point of view 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(person, be better second point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(third person, be better than first)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(person, be better second point of view)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(person, be better second point of view)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(person, be better second point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(third person, be better than first)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(third person, be better than first)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(third person, be better second point of view)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(third person, be better than first)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(third person, be better than first)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(person, be better second point of view)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(third person, be better than first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(person, be better second point of view)