tiger: use whiskers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, lion
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.79
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
use whiskers 1.00
has physical part whiskers 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cat, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tiger, use whiskers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tiger, use whiskers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lion, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tiger, use whiskers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lion, has physical part whiskers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(cat, use whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lion, has physical part whiskers)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cat, use whiskers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cat, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tiger, use whiskers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tiger, use whiskers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lion, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tiger, use whiskers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tiger, use whiskers)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, use whiskers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tiger, use whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lion, has physical part whiskers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, use whiskers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lion, has physical part whiskers)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, use whiskers)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tiger, use whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part whiskers)