tile: crack in bathroom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.61
, surface
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
, texture
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings concrete
Weight: 0.35
, asphalt
Weight: 0.34
, marble
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
crack in bathroom 1.00
crack in bathroom wall 0.95
crack 0.84
crack with heating 0.78
be used in bathrooms 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(marble, crack)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, crack)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(concrete, crack)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(marble, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(marble, crack)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(concrete, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(concrete, crack)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(asphalt, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(asphalt, crack)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(tile, crack in bathroom)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tile, crack with heating)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tile, crack)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tile, crack)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack in bathroom wall)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tile, crack with heating)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack in bathroom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tile, crack in bathroom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(concrete, crack)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(marble, crack)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack in bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(asphalt, crack)