tile: crack with heating

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.61
, surface
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
, texture
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings concrete
Weight: 0.35
, asphalt
Weight: 0.34
, marble
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
crack with heating 1.00
crack with underfloor heating 0.88
crack 0.83
crack in bathroom 0.78
crack in bathroom wall 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(marble, crack)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, crack)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(concrete, crack)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(marble, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(marble, crack)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(concrete, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(concrete, crack)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(asphalt, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(asphalt, crack)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tile, crack with heating)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack with underfloor heating)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tile, crack)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tile, crack)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack in bathroom)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tile, crack with underfloor heating)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tile, crack)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(tile, crack in bathroom)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack in bathroom wall)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tile, crack with underfloor heating)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tile, crack in bathroom)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tile, crack in bathroom)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tile, crack in bathroom wall)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tile, crack in bathroom wall)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tile, crack in bathroom wall)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tile, crack with underfloor heating)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack with heating)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tile, crack with heating)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(concrete, crack)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(marble, crack)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tile, crack with heating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(asphalt, crack)