tin cans: be vs aluminum cans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents album
Weight: 0.49
Siblings guitar
Weight: 0.29
, reggae
Weight: 0.27
, dookie
Weight: 0.27
, midnight sun
Weight: 0.27
, solo
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs aluminum cans 1.00
be vs aluminum 0.92
is steel cans 0.88
be better than steel cans 0.87
is steel cans coated with tin 0.85
is steel cans coated 0.85
is vs electric 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tin cans, be vs aluminum)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(tin cans, be vs aluminum)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, be vs aluminum)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tin cans, be vs aluminum)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(tin cans, is steel cans)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tin cans, is steel cans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(tin cans, is steel cans coated)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, is steel cans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(tin cans, is steel cans coated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tin cans, is steel cans coated with tin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tin cans, is steel cans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, be better than steel cans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(tin cans, is steel cans coated with tin)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, is steel cans coated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tin cans, is steel cans coated)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tin cans, be better than steel cans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tin cans, be better than steel cans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tin cans, is steel cans coated with tin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, is steel cans coated with tin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(tin cans, be better than steel cans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans)