tip: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gem
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, way
Weight: 0.56
Siblings restaurant bill
Weight: 0.53
, point
Weight: 0.31
, drop
Weight: 0.30
, answer
Weight: 0.30
, anything
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
feel good 0.80
has quality bad 0.79
keep going 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gem, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(tip, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gem, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gem, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gem, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(tip, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(tip, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tip, keep going)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(tip, keep going)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(tip, keep going)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tip, feel good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tip, has quality bad)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tip, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(tip, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(gem, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(tip, go bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(gem, has quality bad)