:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(car tire, go flat)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(spare tire, go flat)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(tire, is flat)
Similarity expansion
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(tire, get flat)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(tire, go flat)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tire, go flat)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tire, go flat)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tire, get flat)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(tire, look flat)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(tire, look flat)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tire, look flat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tire, going flat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(tire, going flat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(tire, going flat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tire, look flat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tire, go flat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(tire, going flat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tire, get flat)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tire, get flat)
...
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tire, is flat)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tire, is flat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(car tire, go flat)