tire: look flat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, equipment
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spare tire
Weight: 0.69
, tread
Weight: 0.46
, spare
Weight: 0.44
, flat tire
Weight: 0.35
, car tire
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
look flat 1.00
go flat 0.93
get flat 0.93
is flat 0.93
going flat 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(car tire, go flat)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(spare tire, go flat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(car tire, go flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(car tire, go flat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(spare tire, go flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(spare tire, go flat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(tire, look flat)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(tire, get flat)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(tire, is flat)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(tire, go flat)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tire, is flat)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tire, go flat)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tire, look flat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tire, look flat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(spare tire, go flat)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tire, look flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(car tire, go flat)