tobacco: be better than cigarettes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcohol
Weight: 0.64
, poison
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, drug use
Weight: 0.62
Siblings nicotine
Weight: 0.62
, virginia
Weight: 0.59
, snuff
Weight: 0.49
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.37
, ethyl alcohol
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than cigarettes 1.00
be put in cigarettes 0.93
be worse than smoking 0.83
be called tobacco 0.79
affect non smokers 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(nicotine, be put in cigarettes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(nicotine, be put in cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nicotine, be put in cigarettes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(tobacco, be put in cigarettes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be put in cigarettes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(tobacco, be put in cigarettes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tobacco, be put in cigarettes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tobacco, be called tobacco)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, affect non smokers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be called tobacco)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(tobacco, affect non smokers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(tobacco, be called tobacco)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(tobacco, be called tobacco)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tobacco, affect non smokers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tobacco, affect non smokers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tobacco, be worse than smoking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nicotine, be put in cigarettes)