tofu: be good for babies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, ingredient
Weight: 0.56
, cheese
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.55
Siblings soy sauce
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35
, chicken
Weight: 0.35
, meat pie
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for babies 1.00
be bad for females 0.80
be bad for dogs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tofu, be good for babies)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for females)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for females)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tofu, be bad for females)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for females)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be good for babies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tofu, be good for babies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)