tokyo: be bad place live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prefecture
Weight: 0.62
, city
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mexico city
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, new york city
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34
, connecticut
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad place live 1.00
be good place visit 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(city, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(tokyo, be bad place live)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(city, be good place visit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, be good place visit)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be bad place live)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be good place visit)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be good place visit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(city, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tokyo, be bad place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new york city, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(new york city, be good place visit)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(connecticut, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be bad place live)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mexico city, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be good place visit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(tokyo, be bad place live)

Similarity expansion

0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tokyo, be good place visit)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be good place visit)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tokyo, be good place visit)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(tokyo, be good place visit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(tokyo, be bad place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(city, be good place visit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(connecticut, be bad place live)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(new york city, be good place visit)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(connecticut, be good place visit)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mexico city, be good place visit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(tokyo, be bad place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(city, be good place visit)