tokyo: be important to rhett

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prefecture
Weight: 0.62
, city
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mexico city
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, new york city
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34
, connecticut
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to rhett 1.00
is interesting 0.78
is significant 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(location, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tokyo, be important to rhett)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(location, is significant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(location, is significant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(location, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tokyo, be important to rhett)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tokyo, be important to rhett)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tokyo, is significant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tokyo, is significant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(tokyo, is significant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, is significant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be important to rhett)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tokyo, be important to rhett)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(location, is significant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tokyo, be important to rhett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(location, is significant)