tom: be with debbie in emmerdale

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.64
, kid
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.59
, artist
Weight: 0.58
Siblings john smith
Weight: 0.36
, adam smith
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with debbie in emmerdale 1.00
be in emmerdale after debbie 0.98
get upset with amanda 0.80
is cruise divorce katie holmes 0.78
wolfe 's 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tom, be in emmerdale after debbie)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tom, be in emmerdale after debbie)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tom, is cruise divorce katie holmes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(tom, is cruise divorce katie holmes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(tom, be in emmerdale after debbie)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tom, is cruise divorce katie holmes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tom, be in emmerdale after debbie)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(tom, is cruise divorce katie holmes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tom, get upset with amanda)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(tom, get upset with amanda)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(tom, get upset with amanda)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tom, get upset with amanda)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale)