tom: get upset with amanda

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.64
, kid
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.59
, artist
Weight: 0.58
Siblings john smith
Weight: 0.36
, adam smith
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
get upset with amanda 1.00
be with debbie in emmerdale 0.80
be in emmerdale after debbie 0.79
get upset 0.78
is cruise divorce katie holmes 0.77
feel sorry for injun joe 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(tom, get upset with amanda)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tom, is cruise divorce katie holmes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(tom, is cruise divorce katie holmes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tom, is cruise divorce katie holmes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(tom, is cruise divorce katie holmes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tom, be in emmerdale after debbie)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tom, be in emmerdale after debbie)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(tom, be in emmerdale after debbie)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tom, get upset)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(tom, be with debbie in emmerdale)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tom, be in emmerdale after debbie)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tom, feel sorry for injun joe)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tom, get upset)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tom, get upset)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tom, get upset)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tom, feel sorry for injun joe)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tom, feel sorry for injun joe)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tom, feel sorry for injun joe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tom, get upset with amanda)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tom, get upset with amanda)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tom, get upset with amanda)