tonsil: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	lymph node Weight: 0.63 , tissue Weight: 0.59 , throat Weight: 0.54 , thing Weight: 0.49
Siblings	salivary gland Weight: 0.35 , bone tissue Weight: 0.35 , prostate gland Weight: 0.34 , mammary gland Weight: 0.34 , bone marrow Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
go bad	0.79
has quality function	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(throat, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(tonsil, has quality bad)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(tissue, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(tonsil, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(throat, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(mammary gland, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(bone marrow, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(throat, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(tonsil, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(tissue, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(tonsil, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(mammary gland, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(mammary gland, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(bone marrow, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(bone marrow, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(tonsil, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(tonsil, has quality good)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(tonsil, has quality good)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(tonsil, has quality good)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(tonsil, go bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(tonsil, go bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(tonsil, go bad)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(tonsil, has quality good)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(tonsil, go bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(tonsil, has quality function)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(tonsil, has quality function)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(tonsil, has quality function)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(tonsil, has quality function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(tonsil, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(throat, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(mammary gland, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(bone marrow, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(throat, has quality bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(tonsil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)