throat: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symptom
Weight: 0.61
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.61
, body part
Weight: 0.59
, neck
Weight: 0.57
, mouth
Weight: 0.56
Siblings palate
Weight: 0.49
, stomach
Weight: 0.34
, nose
Weight: 0.34
, esophagus
Weight: 0.34
, abdomen
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality worse 0.87
be bad year 0.79
has quality function 0.76
feel good 0.76
is fat bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(throat, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mouth, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(throat, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(throat, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(neck, feel good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(throat, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(neck, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(throat, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(throat, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(neck, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mouth, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(neck, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mouth, be bad year)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(neck, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(neck, feel good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mouth, be bad year)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(palate, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mouth, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(neck, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(neck, feel good)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(throat, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(palate, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(palate, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(esophagus, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(esophagus, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(esophagus, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(esophagus, has quality worse)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(esophagus, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(esophagus, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(throat, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(throat, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(neck, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mouth, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(neck, feel good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mouth, be bad year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(palate, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(esophagus, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(neck, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mouth, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(neck, feel good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(throat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mouth, be bad year)