mouth: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mucous membrane
Weight: 0.63
, body part
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.59
, thumb
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pussy
Weight: 0.62
, tongue
Weight: 0.61
, throat
Weight: 0.56
, wisdom tooth
Weight: 0.54
, hard palate
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
is quality 0.87
taste bad 0.80
be bad year 0.79
hurt bad 0.77
feel good 0.76
has quality jokes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mouth, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mouth, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(throat, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, hurt bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality jokes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pussy, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mouth, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mouth, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pussy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pussy, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(throat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(throat, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, is quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, hurt bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, has quality jokes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(mouth, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mouth, be bad year)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mouth, be bad year)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mouth, be bad year)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mouth, be bad year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mouth, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, has quality jokes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, hurt bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(throat, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pussy, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)