wisdom tooth: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tooth
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, jaw
Weight: 0.57
, mouth
Weight: 0.54
Siblings tooth decay
Weight: 0.38
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.34
, molar
Weight: 0.33
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.33
, intuition
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
smell bad 0.84
has quality bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tooth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, taste bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tooth, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mouth, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, taste bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tooth, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouth, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mouth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tooth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tooth decay, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(wisdom tooth, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, smell bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, smell bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(wisdom tooth, smell bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, smell bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tooth, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mouth, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tooth decay, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tooth, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(wisdom tooth, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mouth, has quality bad)