tool: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
, example
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68
, compass
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be at desk 0.78
be at your desk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at office)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at your desk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(calculator, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(calculator, be at office)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(calculator, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(calculator, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(calculator, be at your desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tool, be at office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tool, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(calculator, be at office)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(calculator, be at desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(calculator, be at your desk)