calculator: be at desk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.68
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, computer
Weight: 0.56
Siblings abacus
Weight: 0.47
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.36
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, compass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at desk 1.00
be at on desk 0.98
be at your desk 0.96
be at desk drawer 0.92
be put on table or desk 0.89
sit on top of desk 0.87
be used to use up desk space 0.85
be more expensive than desk top computer 0.80
be at office 0.78
be at in office 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(calculator, be at desk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer, be at on desk)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(calculator, be at desk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(computer, be at in office)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(calculator, be at desk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(calculator, be at desk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(computer, be at on desk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(computer, be at desk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tool, be at office)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(computer, be at in office)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at on desk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at desk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at office)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at in office)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at desk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at your desk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at desk drawer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at office)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer, be at on desk)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(computer, be at in office)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(calculator, be at desk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, be at desk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at your desk)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, be at your desk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at desk drawer)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, be at desk drawer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at office)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, be at office)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(calculator, be at desk)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(calculator, be at your desk)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at your desk)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(calculator, be at your desk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(calculator, be at desk drawer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk drawer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(calculator, be at desk drawer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(calculator, be at office)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(calculator, sit on top of desk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(calculator, sit on top of desk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(calculator, sit on top of desk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(calculator, be at desk drawer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(calculator, be at your desk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(calculator, be at office)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(calculator, sit on top of desk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at office)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(calculator, be at office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(calculator, be at desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(computer, be at desk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(computer, be at on desk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(computer, be at in office)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tool, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, be at desk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, be at your desk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, be at desk drawer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, be at office)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(computer, be at desk)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(computer, be at on desk)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(computer, be at in office)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(calculator, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tool, be at office)