tool: be important in cooking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in cooking 1.00
be important for foods 0.78
be important in teaching 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tool, be important in cooking)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tool, be important in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tool, be important in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tool, be important in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(tool, be important in cooking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tool, be important in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(tool, be important in cooking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(tool, be important in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tool, be important in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tool, be important in cooking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tool, be important in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tool, be important in cooking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tool, be important in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(tool, be important in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)