method: be important in teaching

Related concepts

Parents	approach Weight: 0.72 , standard Weight: 0.66 , option Weight: 0.65 , tool Weight: 0.61
Siblings	algorithm Weight: 0.69 , extraction Weight: 0.67 , strategy Weight: 0.67 , adhesive tape Weight: 0.66 , spray Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in teaching important	1.00
be important in teaching	1.00
be important teaching	1.00
be in teaching	0.97
be important for learning	0.87
be in education important	0.85
be important to education	0.84
be important for teachers	0.83
is learning	0.83
be in education	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(approach, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(approach, be important teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(standard, be in education important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(standard, be important to education) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(standard, be important for teachers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(approach, is learning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(approach, be important in teaching)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(approach, be important teaching)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(standard, be in education important)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(standard, be important to education)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(approach, is learning)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(standard, be important for teachers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(approach, be important teaching)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(standard, be in education important)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(standard, be important to education)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for teachers)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(approach, is learning)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(approach, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(approach, be important teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(standard, be in education important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(standard, be important to education) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(standard, be important for teachers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(approach, is learning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(method, be important in teaching)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(approach, is learning)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(standard, be important to education)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(standard, be in education important)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(standard, be important for teachers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(strategy, be important for learning)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(standard, be in education important)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(standard, be important to education)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(approach, is learning)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(method, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(standard, be important for teachers)