strategy: be important for learning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for learning 1.00
is learning 0.95
be in teaching important 0.87
be important in teaching 0.87
be important teaching 0.87
be important in education 0.82
be in teaching 0.82
be important in counselling 0.81
be important in work 0.80
be important in school 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(objective, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(policy, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(policy, be important in school)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(policy, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strategy, be important for learning)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in education)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in school)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(objective, be important in education)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(objective, be important in education)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in school)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in education)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important teaching)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(approach, is learning)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(objective, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(policy, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(policy, be important in school)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(policy, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(approach, is learning)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(approach, is learning)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(approach, be important in teaching)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(approach, be important teaching)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(approach, be important teaching)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(framework, be important in counselling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(strategy, be important for learning)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(strategy, be in teaching)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strategy, be important for learning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(policy, be important in work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(policy, be important in education)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(policy, be important in school)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(objective, be important in education)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, is learning)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(framework, be important in counselling)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(policy, be important in work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(policy, be important in education)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(policy, be important in school)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(objective, be important in education)